Either I'm confused or the gc is

[rikki cattermole]

On 23/10/2020 4:56 AM, donallen wrote:
> ==3854==    by 0x1B7E98: void 
> verifier.main(immutable(char)[][]).walk_account_tree(verifier.main(immutable(char)[][]).Account, 
> int) (verifier.d:272)
> ==3854==  Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
> ==3854==    at 0x1B77FC: void 
> verifier.main(immutable(char)[][]).walk_account_tree(verifier.main(immutable(char)[][]).Account, 
> int) (verifier.d:84)
> ==3854==
> ==3854== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)

That is coming up an awful lot.

We'd need walk_account_tree source, to know if its doing something funky.

But upon reviewing how the entire thing is working, I think we need 
one_row and next_row_available_p source as well. Oh and reset_stmt too.