Motive behind !empty() with front() instead of Optional front()
Per Nordlöw
per.nordlow at gmail.com
Tue Apr 6 20:34:08 UTC 2021
On Tuesday, 6 April 2021 at 02:14:17 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
> Here's what the generic identity function *would* look like if
> `ref` were a type qualifier:
>
> T identity(T)(T arg)
> {
> return arg;
> }
>
> I rest my case.
So what was the motive for not making it a type qualifier in D?
And what are the obstacles for making it that?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list