Tasks, actors and garbage collection
evilrat
evilrat666 at gmail.com
Sun Apr 25 19:23:02 UTC 2021
On Sunday, 25 April 2021 at 17:35:36 UTC, russhy wrote:
> On Sunday, 25 April 2021 at 10:39:01 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 20 April 2021 at 16:44:01 UTC, russhy wrote:
>>> ```D
>>> @safe @system @pure @nogc @noreturn @help @nothrow void
>>>
>>> ```
>>
>> IMO, it's the lack of attribute inference that's the problem
>> not the (implicit) presence of attributes.
>
> This is none of that, it's people bloating the language
>
> Language should stay simple, and people can come up with what
> ever library they want
>
> If people love bloat, they should keep it in their own
> libraries and let the language simple
>
> GC is perfect example of this, it should have been a library
We already have zig and rust, adding yet another fancy slick no
GC landuage is dead end.
Take it from D and there is no point to stay here.
For my needs basically C# is a next step from D, it can call C++
and stuff just not as that friendly like D and requires more
boilerplate, but again that could be automated.
So please stop your no-GC whine. People already heard you, more
than once too.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list