Discussion on static reflection syntax in C++

[SealabJaster]

On Monday, 22 February 2021 at 18:01:34 UTC, SealabJaster wrote:
> On Monday, 22 February 2021 at 16:27:49 UTC, Andrei 
> Alexandrescu wrote:
>> Of possible interest:
>>
>> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2320r0.pdf

Also for that first example under 5.3.3, I hope that they made a 
mistake when writing it, because I really don't see how `cout << 
%x;` prints the value of "V" while `cout << t.%x;` prints "t.m". 
I ask this because I have a slight concern that this might 
actually be intentional.