Discussion on static reflection syntax in C++

[Dukc]

On Monday, 22 February 2021 at 16:54:31 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
> Oh my god, let's hope this goes through and let C++ destroy 
> itself.

I can't agree with this wish - not everybody can switch. If 
something like this goes through it'd only make life more 
difficult to those who don't have the luxury of D (or Rust, Go, 
Nim, etc.). I believe C++ is still an improvement over C (at 
least if you don't go crazy with all the complex features).

But I too kind of fail to see how `f(...[:tuple:]..., a, b)` 
would cut it when `tuple.expand.f(a,b)` has been possible in 
"another language" for like 10 years.