On 23/02/2021 7:22 AM, 12345swordy wrote: > Oh great! The named parameter proposal for c++ is got to be the worst > version of named parameters that I ever seen! > https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/g/std-proposals/c/3dUkwyp2Ie4/m/rZ8dgxVlCgAJ They really went with the kitchen sink approach didn't they? Yikes.