Compile time values & implicit conditional mixin, as an alternative to tertiary operator hell and one-compile-time functions.

[Paul Backus]

On Wednesday, 20 January 2021 at 14:43:15 UTC, Paul wrote:
> If I wanted to make this into a serious language suggestion, 
> how should I?
> Does this require a DIP, or does it make sense to first start a 
> discussion post solely about this topic? Am I even being 
> realistic here, I have no idea ":\

A DIP would be required before this feature could be officially 
added to the language, but generally it makes sense to discuss 
the idea with the community before writing a DIP. In this case, I 
believe it is very unlikely that such a DIP would be accepted 
because:

1. The problem it aims to solve can already be solved by existing 
language features (CTFE).
2. It adds a new keyword to the language.