Default struct constructor

[Paul]

On Wednesday, 27 January 2021 at 18:00:02 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>
> struct S {
>   int i;
>
>   static S opCall() {
>     S s;
>
>     import std.random : uniform;
>     s.i = uniform(1, 42);
>
>     return s;
>   }
>
>   static S defaulted() {
>     return S();
>   }
> }

Does this mean opCall takes priority over default constructors 
(or struct literals, I have no clue what the difference is, 
semanthically or implementation wise), whilst it does not when 
arguments are included?
(As https://dlang.org/spec/operatoroverloading.html states 
selfdefined constructors take priority)

Thanks for the suggestion by the way, it seems Jonathan M Davis 
although I hadn't noticed. This seems like a simple solution

By the way, doesnt this mean a this(){} syntax could be 
implemented by treating it as syntactic sugar for opCall? I 
noticed C++ also has non-argument struct constructors, so its a 
bit curious to me.