Discussion Thread: DIP 1036--String Interpolation Tuple Literals--Community Review Round 2

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Sun Jan 31 05:11:44 UTC 2021


On 1/29/2021 7:22 AM, 12345swordy wrote:
> On Friday, 29 January 2021 at 04:21:24 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 1/28/2021 12:34 PM, 12345swordy wrote:
>>> That being said. Would it be easier to convince you to accept this if there 
>>> is a prototype version of this?
>>
>> Prototype of a way to call printf, or prototype of the DIP?
> 
> Prototype of the dip.

No, because it's not a question of can it work (presuming that the DIP was 
improved to more accurately specify it).



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list