Transitions to new language semantics
Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad at gmail.com
Fri Jun 11 12:04:50 UTC 2021
On Friday, 11 June 2021 at 11:48:22 UTC, Dukc wrote:
> This would be short-sighted. It'd mean that the experimental
> feature developers would then have to backport all the compiler
> improvements that have been done while the feature was
> experimental. Its easier to account for the experimental
> features when doing the restructuring.
I would go the opposite direction. Improvements in the unstable
branch that has proven itself stable and with low semantic impact
(like bugfixes and security fixes) would be backported as a
revision of the stable branch.
> Second, if using an experimental feature requires compiling a
> separate compiler branch, not as many will use it. Hence, less
> real world testing, and even less issues ironed out.
It should be compiled and packaged as a nightly delivery.
(Automated)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list