DIP1000: 'return scope' ambiguity and why you can't make opIndex work

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad]

On Saturday, 19 June 2021 at 14:37:24 UTC, Dennis wrote:
> DIP1000 is still behind a preview switch, which you could 
> consider an experimental branch, and it has been for five years 
> now. I don't think incubation time is the problem here, but 
> rather the lack of documentation and thorough testing.

I don't know if people use switches all that much? With an 
experimental branch most hobbyists would use it to get the latest 
features, so I think it would lead to more use of upcoming 
features... but I don't know for sure.