D vs C++ classes?

[jmh530]

On Tuesday, 22 June 2021 at 15:14:02 UTC, mw wrote:
> [snip]
> Not at all. First it's by the programmer's design (if s/he 
> chooses to do it in this way).
>
> Second: to solve diamond problem, undefine / rename a feature 
> usually happen in D:
>
> Class D : B(disable a), C ｛｝ // so using C.a()
>
> Class D : B, C(disable a) ｛｝ // so using B.a()
>
>
> Note: this resolution in D, make A B C D all usable, non of 
> them is abstract.
>
>
> Please check my github example.
> [snip]

Thanks for the reply.

The only github example I could find was in Eiffel

https://github.com/mingwugmail/dlang_tour/tree/master/eiffel/mi

Is that the right one?