Can someone help me convince apache-thrift accept this PR which fix LDC build

[mw]

https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/2404

their comments:

```
Downgrading openssl version? Because someone says something about 
some compiler? Really?
```


my reply:

```
openssl is not downgraded!

If you look closely, the openssl version in the dub.json is D's 
(not C's) openssl version, see here:
https://code.dlang.org/packages/openssl

Versions:				
2.0.3+1.1.0h | 2021-May-13
2.0.2+1.1.0h | 2021-Mar-09
2.0.1+1.1.0h | 2019-May-12
2.0.0+1.1.0h | 2018-Sep-17
1.1.6+1.0.1g | 2017-Nov-05

(the D openssl's version format is: <D openssl version>+<C 
openssl version>

For C's openssl both use_openssl_1_1 () and use_openssl_1_0 are 
supported.

Regard the popularity LDC compiler, please see the D's forum:

https://forum.dlang.org/

```

Can people here convince them LDC is an important D compiler.

Thanks.