Back in D after some absence, some perspective
Basile B.
b2.temp at gmx.com
Wed Mar 10 23:29:21 UTC 2021
On Wednesday, 10 March 2021 at 21:06:52 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Wednesday, 10 March 2021 at 20:17:57 UTC, Max Haughton wrote:
>> Is that realistic for dmd?
>
> Let me say it like this.
> I think It is more realistic than giving up on dmd.
I only have questions about that idea of co-routines.
- would this really solve issues ?
- what is the idea on how to drive the co-routines ?
- launch blindly new ones when the PASS value of a node is not
sufficent ?
and if so, how would that give different results of what is
done actually ?
- dont you rather think that this should be driven by a system
of graph to
determine the right order ?
- are there compilers for other other languages that are forward
and implement this
kind of "next gen" way of driving the semantic ?
There need to be some kind of proof showing the benefit. Pick an
example an describe what is done for now, why this does not work
then describe why this would work better with fibers.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list