Discussion Thread: DIP 1040--Copying, Moving, and Forwarding--Community Review Round 1

[deadalnix]

On Thursday, 11 March 2021 at 04:17:48 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
> Also, doesn't this mean that every move of an object with a 
> destructor requires a copy?

No, only if said object was initialized first.

> Does the copy constructor get  called in such cases?

Why? That would not allow for the removal of the destruction, in 
fact now you'd have 2 object to destroy instead of 1.

> If so, what benefit do moves have over copies?

They do not create a new object to destroy.