Time to move std.experimental.checkedint to std.checkedint ?

[tsbockman]

On Wednesday, 31 March 2021 at 03:30:00 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 3/30/21 1:09 PM, tsbockman wrote:
>> So you're now dismissing Zig as slow because its feature set 
>> surprised you? No real-world data is necessary? No need to 
>> understand any of Zig's relevant optimizations or options?
>
> Instead of passing the burden of proof back and forth, some 
> evidence would be welcome.

I already posted both some Zig benchmark results of my own, and 
some C/C++ results from the paper you linked earlier. You just 
missed them, I guess:

     
https://forum.dlang.org/post/ghcnkevthguciupexeyu@forum.dlang.org
     
https://forum.dlang.org/post/rnotyrxmczbdvxtalarf@forum.dlang.org

Oversimplified: the extra time required in these tests ranged 
from less than 0.1% up to 14%, depending on the application.

Also, the Zig checked binaries are actually slightly smaller than 
the unchecked binaries for some reason.