Plan for D

[Ola Fosheim Grostad]

On Tuesday, 18 May 2021 at 09:43:08 UTC, Dukc wrote:
> As for the second point, why do you suspect it isn't obvious? 
> Phobos and DUB are much more iDiomatic than DMD, so the 
> language designers are using the whole feature set of D 
> regardless of DMD implementation.

Well, what I said is considered a norm in academic circles. So 
the belief that compilers is a show case is not uncommon.

I would never judge a standard library as they tend to be 
affected by issues related to code gen and OS. The standard 
library is kinda part of the compiler backend and runtime. It is 
common for standard libs to be unidiomatic.