Plan for D
Paulo Pinto
pjmlp at progtools.org
Tue May 18 15:11:41 UTC 2021
On Tuesday, 18 May 2021 at 14:47:16 UTC, russhy wrote:
> D could have been the promised alternative to the shitty C++
>
> But no, the GC lovers killed that opportunity, they wanted to
> be instead Java killer, and go are their dreams, now nobody
> know anymore what the GC lovers want D to be?
>
> They can't even admit they were wrong, 0 balls
What is killing D is lack of management.
Swift, Java, C# and Go are doing just fine replacing many C++
workloads, including game engines, AR/VR, unikernels,
hypervisors, GPGPU debuggers and embedded development.
In case of a complaint regarding Swift, RC is GC as per CS
definition.
https://gchandbook.org/
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list