Plan for D

Paulo Pinto pjmlp at progtools.org
Tue May 18 15:11:41 UTC 2021


On Tuesday, 18 May 2021 at 14:47:16 UTC, russhy wrote:
> D could have been the promised alternative to the shitty C++
>
> But no, the GC lovers killed that opportunity, they wanted to 
> be instead Java killer, and go are their dreams, now nobody 
> know anymore what the GC lovers want D to be?
>
> They can't even admit they were wrong, 0 balls

What is killing D is lack of management.

Swift, Java, C# and Go are doing just fine replacing many C++ 
workloads, including game engines, AR/VR, unikernels, 
hypervisors, GPGPU debuggers and embedded development.

In case of a complaint regarding Swift, RC is GC as per CS 
definition.

https://gchandbook.org/



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list