Plan for D

[IGotD-]

On Thursday, 20 May 2021 at 08:31:47 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grostad 
wrote:
>
> Lower the goal to having a library RC pointer with ARC and 
> suddenly you are in a better position than C++ for some use 
> cases.
>
> By pursuing @safe in non-gc code it will either take forever or 
> you'll end up with something too annoying to use.

Doesn't D already have that?

https://dlang.org/library/std/typecons/ref_counted.html

Also when you mention ARC, is that atomic reference counting or 
automatic reference counting?

Yes, @safe and non-gc/any-gc goals should be separated.