How can we make it easier to experiment with the compiler?
Ola Fosheim Grostad
ola.fosheim.grostad at gmail.com
Wed May 26 05:39:19 UTC 2021
On Wednesday, 26 May 2021 at 01:38:59 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
> On Wednesday, 26 May 2021 at 01:25:23 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
> wrote:
>>
>> ...Illusions of Progress provide no actual utility, hence
>> illusions.
>> Packaging DMD otoh, provides _lots_ of utility: exploration
>> and navigation is greatly eased, moreso for people who are
>> less familiar with the codebase.
>
> For what it's worth, I've found that exploration and navigation
> of DMD code becomes much more manageable with an editor that
> supports "goto definition"--ideally with history, so you can
> jump backwards too.
>
> I use vim's built-in ctags support for this, but I imagine most
> popular code editors can be configured to do something similar.
I dont know if it is funny or sad that a thread about enabeling
more compiler experiments ends with a note on adding basic IDE
features to arcane editors...
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list