Proof of concept for v2 - NO duplication, NO `static if` hell, NO difficulty with interoperability

[zjh]

On Monday, 1 November 2021 at 01:55:22 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 10/31/21 9:35 PM, zjh wrote:


Manu's `...` proposal is very convenient. It is orthogonal to the 
`array`. It provides a variety of writing methods. With `...`, 
many implementations are very concise. It is basically a must for 
`C++` users.
The C++ `concept` is also very convenient. When writing 
constraints on a separate `T` type, there is no need to write an 
`if...` behind. With a little effort, users can feel comfortable.
What we need is a good `organization` and gradually achieve the 
`priority goals`. In the `d Forum` and the `D home page `, 
`Users` can see the changes in the `future and now`. We need to 
`attract` excellent people, we need to do a good job in the 
`details` and let `d users` know the strength of `d`.
We should become stronger in being good at (`metaprogramming`) 
and fill the gap in the obvious `weakness(GC)`. In this way, 
naturally, when others think of `metaprogramming`, they think of 
`d`. If they can use `metaprogramming`, they can naturally be 
regarded as excellent.