Suggestion about releases
Imperatorn
johan_forsberg_86 at hotmail.com
Wed Nov 3 16:16:06 UTC 2021
On Wednesday, 3 November 2021 at 15:36:41 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> On Wednesday, 3 November 2021 at 14:30:52 UTC, Paul Backus
> wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 3 November 2021 at 09:13:59 UTC, Imperatorn
>> wrote:
>>> The logic behind that is it would hopefully put more focus on
>>> testing and reliability etc. If we have to live with a
>>> release for a longer time period, the theory is everyone will
>>> be more cautious when making a change.
>>
>> I think your hopes here are probably misplaced. Every change
>> to D's core components (dmd, druntime, and phobos) is already
>> run through the full CI suite and subject to code review
>> before merging. The kinds of bugs that slip past these filters
>> are probably not going to be caught by something as simple as
>> "more caution."
>
> Worse: they'll take longer to be be discovered and fixed.
What's the alternative? Just rolling releases every day or even
don't have releases at all?
To me a release is something that signifies a unit of some kind,
stuff that belongs together.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list