Phobos version naming

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 2021-11-03 11:37, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I'd like to devise a robust version naming for Phobos. What is the best 
> way?
> 
> Currently it's std.v2 but I'm unclear how it goes from there. By semver 
> we'd go with std.v2_0_1 and so on.
> 
> Walter and others say it's better to have "std2" at top level instead of 
> "std.v2" nested inside std. I confess I chose "std.v2" partially because 
> it's easier to implement. But we can go either way. What would be best?
> 

One thought; we could call version actual names, like Ubuntu and OSX do. 
The version numbers will be a minor detail in the documentation.