Phobos version naming

[Max Samukha]

On Thursday, 4 November 2021 at 00:46:35 UTC, Adam Ruppe wrote:

> For example we might not actually use "Stdv2" but instead 
> "std2023". In years prior to that, it is now obviously a future 
> version and thus subject to change, then when 2023 comes along, 
> it is officially stablized and we can start playing with std 
> 2024.
>

What if it's behind schedule? You'd have to explain to people in 
2025 why the future version name is std2023. Also, std2023 is 
ugly.