Future of memory management in D
Atila Neves
atila.neves at gmail.com
Wed Nov 17 21:46:45 UTC 2021
On Tuesday, 16 November 2021 at 18:17:29 UTC, Rumbu wrote:
> At least from my point of view, it seems that recently D made a
> shift from a general purpose language to a C successor,
I mean, it kind of always was, which is even indicated in the
name.
> hence the last efforts to improve betterC and C interop,
> neglecting other areas of the language.
>
> By other areas I mean half baked language built-ins or oop
> support which failed to evolve at least to keep the pace with
> the languages from where D took inspiration initially (e.g.
> Java and its successors).
Where would you say D has failed to evolve in terms of OOP?
> Now, without a gc, more than half of the language risks to
> become unusable and that's why I ask myself how do you see the
> future of the memory management in D?
The GC isn't going anywhere. It's the easiest way to write
memory-safe code other than leaking everything.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list