A couple of extensions to `with` that would be worthwhile

[Paul Backus]

On Wednesday, 13 October 2021 at 13:16:36 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> I think that the point of proposal 1 is to have something like, 
> after lowering to common AST constructs:
>
> ```d
> {
>   {
>     auto xpath = ....;
>     scope (exit) destroy(xpath)
>     // stuff
>   }
>   // destroy(xpath) really happens here
> }
> ```

Destructors are already called automatically at the end of a 
block scope.