A couple of extensions to `with` that would be worthwhile

[deadalnix]

On Wednesday, 13 October 2021 at 20:41:11 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
> Of course one could work out a set of rules for this and add 
> them to the language spec, but it seems like a lot of effort 
> and complexity for not much benefit, especially when we can 
> already get the desired behavior with normal block scopes:
>

This.

If the concern is that the temporary's destruction will destroy 
the variable, it's a general problem that is tackled by ownership.