Thoughts on versioning
Adam D Ruppe
destructionator at gmail.com
Thu Oct 28 14:47:13 UTC 2021
On Thursday, 28 October 2021 at 14:30:38 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
> On 10/28/21 10:18 AM, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
> if there was implicit construction
>
> This is going to still be a bit painful. I was thinking for
> more compiler help.
well, if there was implicit construction, the compiler would do
that conversion for you, c++ style.
but yeah today you can import the other thing and do the
conversion yourself....
> I personally would rather just use the v2 exclusively, and
> eliminate any usage of v1.
I think that ought to be the goal. You'd keep the v1 stuff around
just as a temporary bridge to give some flexibility to schedule
that transition, but realistically, the transition is inevitable
unless you want to lock everything (which is always an option of
course).
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list