core.reflect vs c++ reflection

[Per Nordlöw]

On Tuesday, 28 September 2021 at 12:48:08 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
> That's because a type has no identifier. And this is good 
> anyway because there's never a good reason to get a type as a 
> string. It is a bug waiting to happen any time someone writes 
> that, so making it an error is a good thing.

Can you elaborate on why you consider this being a bug?