I just created a dub package. Frankly, the whole thign is backward.

[bauss]

On Monday, 25 April 2022 at 10:41:35 UTC, user1234 wrote:
> On Monday, 25 April 2022 at 10:38:28 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
> wrote:
>> On Sunday, 24 April 2022 at 09:56:13 UTC, rikki cattermole 
>> wrote:
>>> Is it dmc make? Cygwin's make, Microsoft's nmake? MingW's 
>>> make...
>>
>> GNU-make is dominating, but then you have cmake and the like 
>> with their overcomplicating "autoconfig-setups". Most D 
>> authors probably cannot test their build setup on enough 
>> platforms to iron out all possible build quirks…
>>
>> Dub might be a valuable resource for getting attraction to new 
>> projects, but perhaps insufficient for complex projects.
>
> common have you took a look at how is complex the recipe for 
> what lead to this whole discussion ? it is not one of the 
> complex projects you imagine.

This discussion would never have happened if the project was just 
created with dub in mind from the beginning, like if it was built 
using dub since the beginning and not with make, or at the very 
least both.