Potential of a compiler that creates the executable at once
rempas
rempas at tutanota.com
Fri Feb 11 20:19:16 UTC 2022
On Friday, 11 February 2022 at 18:02:21 UTC, max haughton wrote:
> On Friday, 11 February 2022 at 17:44:45 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
> wrote:
>> On Friday, 11 February 2022 at 17:36:37 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>>
>>> I pulled just this week, and running `wc` on *.d *.c *.h
>>> says...
>>
>> https://github.com/AlDanial/cloc would yield a more practical
>> metric, at least as far as "practical metric" in terms of LoC
>> goes.
>
> ```
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Language files blank
> comment code
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> D 3867 75824
> 88426 431299
> HTML 114 11405
> 967 61083
> C/C++ Header 57 2729
> 992 23332
> C 93 830
> 797 3346
> C++ 19 532
> 139 2249
> ```
> this includes the test suite and other stuff that isn't
> technically the compiler-proper.
Interesting! We could remove the "test-suit" directory and we
could tell it to only parse "D" language files which will give us
more "clean" results. "cloc" is actually what I use and for
DragonFlyBSD, it gave me the same number "OpenHub" gave so I
really wonder how other source code or languages have different
results...
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list