Potential of a compiler that creates the executable at once
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Sat Feb 12 09:00:18 UTC 2022
On 2/12/2022 12:08 AM, rempas wrote:
>> The only thing it has really failed at is the x87, which everyone wants to
>> leave behind anyway.
> Why, what was bad about it? Can I get a little of background on this one?
It doesn't assign variables to x87 registers. The reason it doesn't is because
the x87 is a stack machine, meaning the registers all shift position.
There is a way to fix that by using FXCH instructions, but I never got around to
doing that.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list