Scientific computing and parallel computing C++23/C++26
Bruce Carneal
bcarneal at gmail.com
Thu Jan 13 14:24:59 UTC 2022
On Thursday, 13 January 2022 at 07:46:32 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> On Wednesday, 12 January 2022 at 22:50:38 UTC, Ola Fosheim
> Grøstad wrote:
>> ...
>> What do you think?
>
> ...
>
> D can have a go at it, but only by plugging into the LLVM
> ecosystem where C++ is the name of the game, and given it is
> approaching Linux level of industry contributors it isn't going
> anywhere.
Yes. The language independent work in LLVM in the accelerator
area is hugely important for dcompute, essential. Gotta surf
that wave as we don't have the manpower to go independent. I
dont think *anybody* has that amount of manpower, hence the
collaboration/consolidation around LLVM as a back-end for
accelerators.
>
> There was a time to try overthrow C++, that was 10 years ago,
> LLVM was hardly relevant and GPGPU computing still wasn't
> mainstream.
Yes. The "overthrow" of C++ should be a non-goal, IMO, starting
yesterday.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list