Discussion Thread: DIP 1042--ProtoObject--Community Review Round 1

Fri Jan 14 23:08:29 UTC 2022

On Friday, 14 January 2022 at 22:41:45 UTC, Guillaume Piolat 
wrote:
>
> (Sorry if I misrepresent point of views here. I myself have no 
> formed opinion about all this)

Aftert hinking a bit more: Still supporting the DIP. If this is 
implemented, not only none of my code breaks (!!!) but I can 
derive from ProtoObject progressively and win a few bytes of 
memory. I think the restrictions on hash and opCmp are fair.