Is there any real reason to use "const"?
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Mon Jan 24 15:40:56 UTC 2022
On 1/24/2022 2:06 AM, rempas wrote:
> Also another problem is that I don't like the way "const" is treated in
> functions. For example, you cannot past "const" variables to functions that take
> non-const parameters even if we are using variables which are ALWAYS copied
Not sure what you mean. This compiles:
int foo(const int);
int bar(int i)
{
return foo(i);
}
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list