Is there any real reason to use "const"?
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Mon Jan 24 21:21:50 UTC 2022
On 1/24/2022 11:09 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> Sure, but const isn't necessary for that. Const is a compiler construct to
> prevent you from doing stupid things. But a programming language can run
> perfectly fine with ROM without having a const concept.
>
> D1 put string literals in ROM without const.
Yeah, but it's undefined behavior if you write to them.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list