State of Tooling Survey

[WebFreak001]

On Sunday, 26 June 2022 at 13:40:12 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
> On Sunday, 26 June 2022 at 02:52:05 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
>> Hello everyone, we over at the D Language Code Club discord 
>> server have created a small survey to see what kind of 
>> tooling, libraries and ecosystems everyone in the community is 
>> using.
>>
>> It would be greatly appreciated if you could find the time to 
>> fill in this ~5 minute survey: 
>> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScj0Cp41qeUIU2OgBtry7VxSlwn3H881yQ6WC-icTpybahIoQ/viewform
>>
>> You will be asked about your used Editors/IDEs, packages you 
>> regularly use, plugins, toolchain and software practices you 
>> use.
>>
>> If you have any suggestions for the survey, we can also still 
>> make minor changes and add questions that might fit in.
>
> we have 75 responses already, thanks to everyone who filled out 
> the survey!
>
> Note: the survey was extended a little bit to contain a few 
> common replies in the "other" field, if you want you may be 
> able to edit your submitted response if you were logged in with 
> google as well.
>
> Some changes include:
> - added Neovim reply to editors, will count towards the general 
> VIM replies later though, just did this so Neovim replies also 
> get shown the Vim plugins section, for the people who replied 
> with VIM not being Neovim.
> - added CLion for the same reason with IntelliJ IDEA, opening 
> the additional IntelliJ survey page if selected
> - added `audio-formats` to popular dub packages as the usage 
> amount on the package list was comparably high on all the file 
> format libraries
>
> I'm hoping we can get to over 200 responses! (completely 
> arbitrary number)
>
> Also to all other editor/plugin maintainers: feel free to 
> message me on Matrix (@webfreak:m.wfr.moe) / IRC (WebFreak[m]) 
> / Discord if you want access to the response data rows as well, 
> also groupable by your editors/plugins.

just one more bump for anyone else to submit their answers to the 
survey before we would start evaluating it :)