New competitor to D

[M.M.]

On Friday, 22 July 2022 at 05:39:22 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> On Thursday, 21 July 2022 at 11:00:11 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
> wrote:
>> [...]
>
> The arrogance can be explained by being the same people that 
> lost the C++ ABI vote at ISO, and since then ramped down their 
> involvement either at ISO or clang further development.
>
> https://old.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/w2thvo/carbon_an_experimental_c_successor_language/igs25eu/
>
> and also https://cor3ntin.github.io/posts/abi/
>
> This is one of the reasons why clang is now third in ISO C++ 
> support, and since no other compiler vendor that enjoys clang, 
> seems willing to step into Apple (focused on Swift/Objective-C) 
> or Google's previous roles, it doesn't look like it will change.
>
> Meanwhile those previous clang contributors are now having fun 
> tailoring Carbon as they wish instead of fighting for their 
> papers at ISO.

Very interesting read, thank you for the links. But does that all 
mean that C++ will become a less popular choice in new (large) 
projects in industry?

I always thought that C++ is here to stay...