Using closure in function scope to make "real" private class members

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad]

On Monday, 6 June 2022 at 12:25:51 UTC, zjh wrote:
> `Small things`, to solve big problems, but you are blocking 
> them ,it's `so funny`.

(I am not blocking anything, how could I?)

A large number of *insignificant and random additions* won't 
solve any big problems related to D projects. They will just make 
it more difficult to get to a good place, both in terms of 
language comprehension and in terms of compiler quality.

Language additions should only come as a consequence of a 
targeted strategy that takes the *whole language* into 
consideration.

The wishing-well approach does not work well for language design. 
How many pointless @keywords do you want on your screen?