Using closure in function scope to make "real" private class members
Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad at gmail.com
Thu Jun 9 10:16:06 UTC 2022
On Thursday, 9 June 2022 at 09:47:54 UTC, bauss wrote:
> But perhaps it's better to have `hidden` then anyway since it's
> much more clear.
You might as well, adding a new protection level might be a
breaking change thanks to meta-programming.
It is probably possible to write the parser in such a way that
"hidden" isn't a keyword. At worst it will impact people who use
a type called "hidden".
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list