dip1000 and preview in combine to cause extra safety errors
Dennis
dkorpel at gmail.com
Thu Jun 9 14:32:06 UTC 2022
On Thursday, 9 June 2022 at 13:00:01 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> Well, not a big fan. This is the wrong way around.
It was needed to avoid breaking existing code, which is sometimes
annotated incorrectly because of compiler bugs and the `return
ref scope` ambiguity issue. Once the dip1000 by default
transition has progressed and people corrected the `return ref` /
`return scope` annotations in their code, I think it can become
an error in `@system` code again.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list