dip1000 and preview in combine to cause extra safety errors
Steven Schveighoffer
schveiguy at gmail.com
Mon Jun 13 18:09:35 UTC 2022
On 6/13/22 9:25 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> On Monday, 13 June 2022 at 12:02:31 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
>> Without expressing an opinion either way, I want to note that this has
>> implications for `@nogc`. If you remove `scope` from the parameter of
>> `foo`, the compiler won't let `main` be `@nogc` due to the slice
>> literal allocation.
>>
>> string foo(scope string s) @nogc {
>> return s;
>> }
>>
>> void main() @nogc {
>> foo(['a']);
>> }
>
> It's as if @nogc should track leaks and not allocations...
Wouldn't that be a leak if `['a']` was GC allocated?
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list