`restricted` member variables
Dom Disc
dominikus at scherkl.de
Thu Jun 23 10:30:20 UTC 2022
On Thursday, 23 June 2022 at 10:16:42 UTC, forkit wrote:
> strongly typed, abstract data object is perhaps, the single most
> important concept for good, scalable, software engineering.
>
> Sure, D has a 'workaround' where you can 'simulate' this.
This is no workaround. It's one of Ds basic design choices, and
done so for reasons (the friend-problem), not accidentally.
> it's deficient. As soon as you add any code whatsover to the
> module, the simulation dissolves.
You can prevent that from happening (supported by the OS!). Much
better as you can prevent someone who has access to a module from
changing one of the classes within it (there you have no chance
at all).
I call that strong typed. Much, much stronger than with multiple
classes within one file!
> I think missing this important feature was D's million 'user'
> mistake (a million missing users because of it).
There is no feature missing.
And I still find the way D realizes the same as other languages
do with class private much better. Far from a mistake.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list