The problem that took him 5 years to fix in C++, I solved in a minute with D
bachmeier
no at spam.net
Thu Mar 10 14:10:45 UTC 2022
On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 14:02:20 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
> On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 12:23:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>> On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 11:50:05 UTC, Ola Fosheim
>> Grøstad wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Because negative advertising doesn't work, it is negative and
>>> will be perceived as whining.
>>
>> Advertising? This is a community forum, where community
>> members express personal opinions. There's nothing wrong with
>> discussions about the pros and cons of different programming
>> languages as long as they're civil. I'm not about to tell
>> people to never say anything negative about any language,
>> including those same people who keep popping to remind us of
>> D's shortcomings every time one of these discussions appears.
>
> It wouldn't be so bad if they were making good points. It's not
> productive to counter with "D isn't good at X" where X is
> neither on topic or relevant to the vast majority of
> programmers. It's an emotional response to someone pointing out
> weaknesses in C++. We'd all be better off if they'd stay in
> their C++ bubble and not vandalize otherwise interesting
> discussions.
This is one of the most spectacular cases of off-topic
vandalization of a forum discussion, in a thread announcing
Facebook had started using D in production:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/wllaccthfrnvquuhsbsr@forum.dlang.org
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list