Questions on the new __traits(parameters)

[Timon Gehr]

On 10.03.22 13:57, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
> On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 12:49:57 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
>> handling correctly.
> 
> objection, prejudiced language
> 

Pardon? It's pretty clear that it should not behave this way. The point 
of opApply is to overload on foreach syntax, where you can transparently 
exchange the type of aggregate. This is a headache for generic code that 
can loop either over an array or a struct with an opApply. There is zero 
justification for the meaning of the foreach loop body to change based 
on how the aggregate is expressed.

I guess __traits(parent, {}) and similar are also affected.