Just an example, why D rocks, and C++ s***s...

[mee6]

On Saturday, 19 March 2022 at 20:05:52 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
> On Saturday, 19 March 2022 at 17:43:16 UTC, mee6 wrote:
>> This just boils down to the standard libraries and what they 
>> implement. You can write that helper function put it in a util 
>> file and never have to write it again. D is considerably 
>> lacking when it comes to robust third party libraries. C++ has 
>> so many good libraries in comparison. For D you pretty much 
>> have to roll your own implementation for everything else. 
>> There isn't even basic @nogc containers, so there's a lot you 
>> end up having to write yourself. The allocators are 
>> experimental, not sure how long it's been now. So there isn't 
>> a design philosophy to follow, you'd be making it from the 
>> ground up and that's a lot more work than a simple utility 
>> function. It feels like it's just left unsolved, it feels that 
>> way for D a lot.
>
> Excellent example of the off-topic vandalism of discussions I 
> wrote about the other day. It *always* happens as soon as 
> someone attempts to say something good about D.
>
> Your response has nothing to do with the post. If I were in 
> charge, I would delete it and ban you from posting here again. 
> Not sure if this is an organized effort, but troll posts like 
> this get tiring.

It's not off topic, your post is completely off topic ironically 
though. A comparison was made and I elaborated on that 
comparison. It seems you don't like it cause I was being critical 
of D.