Auto function without return statement, prefer an explicit void

[Dukc]

On Thursday, 19 May 2022 at 09:15:50 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
> I like explicit return types. But I also like inference.
>
> ```d
> struct SomeContainer(T)
> {
> /* ... */
>     auto clear()
>     {
>         head = 0;
>         tail = 0;
>         buf[] = T.init;
>     }
> }
> ```

Inference is on in this example even with an explicit return 
type, since you are inside a template. And when you are not, you 
can make the function a parameterless template.

Still, I'm with you in that I disagree somewhat with that 
no-inferred-void rule. Sometimes it's better to just static 
assert the return type as void, or not bother with checking it at 
all. There are times when one does not want templates.