Why is D unpopular, redux.
FeepingCreature
feepingcreature at gmail.com
Tue May 24 13:13:01 UTC 2022
On Tuesday, 24 May 2022 at 13:09:54 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 24 May 2022 at 11:38:55 UTC, FeepingCreature wrote:
>> I think we need a lot more people just jumping in and coding
>> wildly ahead, and then sharing their results. An experimental
>> branch? D3? Whatever must be changed to make that possible, I
>> support it.
>
> Maybe Neat and SDC could be joined and form a foundation?
>
(Brief sidenote: Neat is a totally different compiler and
language, it only steals some syntax from D. It's a project that
is motivated by my experience with D, but it's not a D variant.
It's doing its own thing, language-wise. Not to mention that it's
far pre-1.0 in terms of D-equivalent features.)
> You need a solid modular architecture to support evolutionary
> development. There is enough CPU power to take the overhead in
> 2022. Designing architecture is hard on-paper work, not
> something you evolve though. So that is where one should start.
>
Fully agreed, but don't underestimate how magical DMD's
performance is. I wish neat's compiler was as speedy.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list