The process described in the linked article could be a good thing for D

[forkit]

On Wednesday, 25 May 2022 at 23:32:36 UTC, max haughton wrote:
> On Wednesday, 25 May 2022 at 23:02:54 UTC, forkit wrote:
>> If it were me, I 'lead' by saying D3 will be @safe by default. 
>> Now, let's get to work on it.
>
> This is exactly the kind of thing that I am trying to stress 
> isn't the scope I'm talking about: You can't coordinate an open 
> source project like this, it doesn't work. The overall strategy 
> isn't the issue, I want to improve the smaller things 
> underneath that. The apparatus for tracking smaller projects 
> simply isn't there.
>
> Have you contributed to D? There is a huge amount of stuff at 
> the bottom of the stack that needs improving and tracking, the 
> actual design of the language is the easy part as far as I'm 
> concerned.
>
> Even ignoring that you're talking about a level of structure 
> that is probably impossible unless the D Foundation itself had 
> a significant number of full time employees, it's just not what 
> I'm talking about.

Well, I agree that we disagree ;-)

You want to advance the D project using 'systems on servers'.

I think it can only advance, through better understanding human 
and social psychology.