The process described in the linked article could be a good thing for D
forkit
forkit at gmail.com
Thu May 26 08:52:40 UTC 2022
On Thursday, 26 May 2022 at 01:27:45 UTC, max haughton wrote:
> On Thursday, 26 May 2022 at 01:03:00 UTC, forkit wrote:
>
>> I think it can only advance, through better understanding
>> human and social psychology.
>
> I am not saying this can be avoided, I'm saying that this a
> completely different level of abstraction to what I'm trying to
> suggest by linking the article (more specifically the first
> step).
>
> This is the absolute basics. There's no point in waffling about
> psychology if you have almost no way of judging the effect of
> any changes you make.
Umm.. psychology is a science, with plenty of peer-reviewed
scientific research to back up the claims it makes.
I am unaware of any
management/leadership/motivation/decision-making (etc) theories
that don't draw on such research. They all involve humans
afterall.
If anything I've said is unrelated to your goals fine, ignore it,
but it's not 'waffling' - it comes from peer-reviewed, scientific
research.
Good luck with your strategy. I hope it works out ;-)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list